Liquidation Strategy Analysis: $1.8M Captured, 87.3% Success Rate

Our liquidation hunting strategy has generated $1.8M in profits over 6 months of operation, achieving an 87.3% success rate across major DeFi lending protocols. This deep dive reveals the technical details and risk management approaches that make liquidation arbitrage consistently profitable.

Understanding Liquidation MEV

Liquidation MEV occurs when borrowers in lending protocols like Aave, Compound, or MakerDAO become undercollateralized. When a position falls below the required collateral ratio, liquidators step in to repay the loan and seize the collateral at a discount, typically 5-10% below market value.

Performance Summary (April - October 2025)

$1.8M
Total Captured
87.3%
Success Rate
$2,847
Avg Profit/Liquidation
632
Successful Liquidations

Protocol Breakdown

Aave (43% of volume)

Aave remains our most profitable liquidation target, generating $774K over 6 months. The protocol's 5 liquidation incentives combined with high gas efficiency make it ideal for frequent small-to-medium liquidations. Average profit per liquidation: $2,156.

Aave Performance Metrics

Metric Value Change vs Q2
Total Liquidations 359 +23%
Success Rate 91.2% +4.1%
Avg Profit $2,156 +12%
Gas Costs $47 -8%

Compound (32% of volume)

Compound contributed $576K in profits with 194 successful liquidations. The protocol's straightforward liquidation mechanics and predictable incentive structure make it reliable for consistent performance. Average profit: $2,969.

MakerDAO (25% of volume)

Maker's complex liquidation system, involving multiple collateral types and auction mechanics, generated $450K in profits. While more technically challenging, the larger position sizes and higher liquidation bonuses create premium opportunities. Average profit: $5,625.

Technical Implementation

Our liquidation strategy combines real-time monitoring, predictive analysis, and rapid execution across multiple protocols:

Liquidation Monitoring System
# PoIPoE Liquidation Strategy Implementation
import asyncio
from web3 import Web3
from web3.middleware import geth_poa_middleware
import aiohttp
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Optional
import logging

@dataclass
class LiquidationOpportunity:
    protocol: str
    borrower: str
    debt_token: str
    collateral_token: str
    debt_amount: float
    collateral_amount: float
    health_factor: float
    estimated_profit: float
    gas_estimate: int
    priority: int

class LiquidationBot:
    def __init__(self):
        self.web3 = Web3(Web3.HTTPProvider(os.environ['ETHEREUM_RPC']))
        self.contracts = self.load_contracts()
        self.profitable_ratios = {
            'aave': 1.05,  # 5% liquidation bonus
            'compound': 1.08,  # 8% liquidation bonus
            'maker': 1.10  # 10% liquidation bonus
        }
    
    async def monitor_liquidations(self):
        while True:
            try:
                opportunities = await self.scan_all_protocols()
                profitable_ops = [
                    op for op in opportunities 
                    if op.health_factor < 1.0 and 
                       self.is_profitable(op) and
                       self.has_sufficient_gas(op)
                ]
                
                if profitable_ops:
                    await self.execute_liquidations(profitable_ops)
                    
            except Exception as e:
                logging.error(f"Monitoring error: {e}")
            
            await asyncio.sleep(1)  # Check every second
    
    async def scan_protocol(self, protocol: str) -> List[LiquidationOpportunity]:
        if protocol == 'aave':
            return await self.scan_aave_positions()
        elif protocol == 'compound':
            return await self.scan_compound_positions()
        elif protocol == 'maker':
            return await self.scan_maker_positions()
    
    def is_profitable(self, opportunity: LiquidationOpportunity) -> bool:
        # Calculate potential profit after gas costs
        gas_cost = opportunity.gas_estimate * self.web3.eth.gas_price * self.web3.eth.get_block('latest').gas_limit
        profit_threshold = gas_cost * 1.5  # Require 50% profit margin
        
        return opportunity.estimated_profit > profit_threshold

Risk Management Framework

Liquidation MEV requires sophisticated risk management to handle protocol-specific challenges and market volatility:

Smart Contract Risk

  • Audit Verification: All target protocols undergo security audits before integration
  • Fail-Safe Mechanisms: Automatic position closure if protocol health metrics deteriorate
  • Gas Limit Protection: Maximum gas limit per transaction to prevent failed executions

Market Risk

  • Slippage Protection: Maximum 2% slippage for collateral asset purchases
  • Flash Loan Validation: Verify flash loan availability before initiating liquidation
  • Price Oracle Cross-Validation: Multiple price sources prevent oracle manipulation

Operational Risk

  • Network Congestion Monitoring: Pause operations when gas prices exceed thresholds
  • Position Size Limits: Maximum liquidation size based on protocol liquidity
  • Emergency Stop Mechanism: Manual override for critical situations

Performance Optimization

Several key optimizations have improved our liquidation success rate from 78% to 87.3%:

Gas Optimization

Average gas costs decreased 23% through batched transactions and optimized contract interactions. We now use flash loans for larger liquidations, reducing gas costs by 40% for positions over $100K.

Speed Improvements

Our execution time improved from 2.3 seconds to 0.8 seconds through:

  • Direct RPC node connections for priority processing
  • Pre-calculated transaction parameters for rapid execution
  • Parallel monitoring of all target protocols

Predictive Analysis

Machine learning models now predict liquidations 30-90 seconds in advance, allowing us to prepare transactions and compete more effectively for high-value positions.

Market Dynamics

The liquidation MEV landscape has evolved significantly in 2025:

  • Increased Competition: More sophisticated bots have reduced average profit per liquidation by 15%
  • Protocol Innovation: New lending protocols with different liquidation mechanics create fresh opportunities
  • Cross-Chain Expansion: Layer-2 lending protocols show growing liquidation volumes
  • Institutional Participation: Traditional financial institutions entering DeFi lending increase position sizes

Future Outlook

We anticipate several trends will shape liquidation MEV in the coming months:

  • Layer-2 Growth: Arbitrum and Optimism lending protocols will see increased activity
  • MEV Protection: Protocols implementing anti-MEV measures may reduce opportunities
  • Cross-Chain Liquidations: Multi-chain lending protocols will create new arbitrage opportunities
  • Regulatory Clarity: Better understanding of liquidation compliance requirements

Conclusion

Liquidation MEV remains a consistently profitable strategy with proper implementation and risk management. Our 6-month track record demonstrates that systematic approaches can achieve 87.3% success rates while generating meaningful profits.

As the DeFi ecosystem matures, successful liquidation strategies will require continuous optimization, multi-chain awareness, and sophisticated risk management. PoIPoE's platform is uniquely positioned to capitalize on these evolving opportunities through our advanced monitoring systems and execution infrastructure.

About the Strategy Team

PoIPoE's Strategy Team specializes in DeFi MEV strategies with 12+ years combined experience in algorithmic trading, smart contract development, and protocol research. They manage over $50M in MEV strategies across 8 different protocols.